Study on coal dust diffusion law and new pneumatic spiral spray dedusting technology at transfer point of mine cross roadway (2024)

Journal List
PLoS One
PMC9394847

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

PLoS One. 2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Published online 2022 Aug 22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272304

PMCID: PMC9394847

PMID: 35994466

Deji Jing, Conceptualization,^#^1,^2,³ Hongwei Liu, Data curation,^1,^2,³ Tian Zhang, Formal analysis,^#^1,^2,^3,^* Shaocheng Ge, Visualization,⁴ Shuaishuai Ren, Methodology,^1,^2,³ and Mingxing Ma, Conceptualization^1,^2,³

Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi, Editor

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Abstract

In order to solve the problem of coal dust pollution at the transfer point, a three-dimensional numerical model of wind flow-coal dust at the loading point of underground rubber run was established by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) discrete particle model and finite element method and k-ε turbulence model, and the coal dust diffusion pollution phenomenon caused by the coal flow transfer under the intersection of wind flow in the cross tunnel was studied. Based on the simulation results of wind flow velocity contour, pressure contour and isochronous flow vector distribution, the influence mechanism of wind flow and coal dust characteristics on the distribution of wind flow and coal dust diffusion in the roadway is analysed, and a dust control and reduction system and treatment scheme with new pneumatic screw spray technology as the core is proposed to suppress coal dust pollution at the reloading point. The results of the study show that the wind flow distribution is mainly influenced by the intersection of tape traction and cross-roadway wind flow, showing a complex multi-layer distribution along the roadway and in the normal direction; the diffusion of coal dust of different particle sizes is influenced by the roadway wind flow, and coal dust with particle sizes in the range of 10μm~20μm is more easily diffused, and the dust with particle sizes in the range of 20μm~45μm is mainly collected and suspended near the vortex wind flow at the cross-roadway. The coal dust in the range of 20 μm~45 μm is more likely to gather in the vortex; the treatment system effectively controls the coal dust inside the dust cover, and the spiral-shaped transported droplet particle group formed by the pneumatic spiral spray combines with it efficiently, which verifies the dust control and reduction effect of the pneumatic spiral spray system at the transfer point, and the dust removal efficiency reaches 89.35%~93.06%, which provides relevant theoretical support for the treatment of dust pollution at the coal transfer point in underground coal mines It provides the theoretical support and means to control dust pollution at underground coal transfer points.

1 Introduction

Pneumoconiosis is currently the most serious occupational disease in China accounting for about 90% of the total number of occupational diseases, China has more than 975,000 cases in 2019, including 873,000 cases of occupational pneumoconiosis, the number of new cases of pneumoconiosis in China from 2007 to 2019 and accounting for the total number of occupational diseases increased year by year, the number of cases of occupational pneumoconiosis in the last decade increased from 10,963 cases to a maximum of 28,088 in 2016 cases. Coal dust is a serious health hazard to workers, dust not only causes damage to mechanical equipment used in mining coal mines, but also reduces the quality of the environment and the visible range of workers, while leading to pneumoconiosis, a serious occupational disease [1–3]. In addition to bringing occupational diseases such as pneumoconiosis to workers, dust pollution also increases the likelihood of underground explosions [4–6]. More than 90% of existing coal mines in China are underground, and coal dust is mainly generated from drum cutting and propulsion during mine coal mining [7,8], and underground coal transfer and retransfer transport is one of the main factors of underground coal dust pollution [9,10]. Since the 1950s, many researchers [11,12] have systematically investigated the dust diffusion law with wind [13,14]. For the dust production, diffusion mechanism and its characteristics at the transfer point, the FLUENT-based dust diffusion at the transfer point of the belt conveyor was investigated and the diffusion law of dust at the coal mining face was studied [15] studied and numerically simulated the effect of turbulent airflow disturbance of coal chips on coal dust pollution characteristics, airflow migration and coal dust dispersion, and established a negative pressure secondary dust removal device [16,17]. However, as conventional spray dust control measures were not effective, Torano et al. confirmed the feasibility of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for modelling dust particles in the working face tunnel to further predict airflow and dust within the working face; a method that successfully overcame the shortcomings of traditional calculation methods [18]. CFD was used to conduct a study of dust transport patterns in continuous working faces and to propose a novel method of dust suppression for ventilation. A reasonable dust management technology solution can ensure safe coal mine production while improving the sustainability of the coal mining process [19,20]. However, despite extensive research on spraying and improvements in related theoretical techniques, there are still no effective control measures at high dust concentrations at the transfer point [21–24]. There are few studies at home and abroad that combine the transfer process with the wind flow direction and propose control solutions. Therefore, in order to achieve the desired dust control effect, a numerical study on the distribution of wind flow characteristics and coal dust dispersion in coal transfer is carried out at the No. 2 transfer point of Min Dong No. 1 mine’s 00 working face.

To this end, this paper proposes a dust control and reduction system and treatment scheme with a new pneumatic spiral spray technology as the core, and develops a device for installing a dust cover at the intersection of the transfer point. In this method, on the one hand, a mist curtain formed by a spiral spray is used inside the dust hood to capture coal dust particles and suppress coal dust pollution. On the other hand, two auxiliary pneumatic atomising nozzles provide further dust reduction and effectively reduce the dust concentration in the tunnel. This method effectively solves the problem of heavy dust contamination at the coal transfer point. In order to determine the effectiveness of the dust hood and to guide its further development and application, the paper uses a fluid dynamics (CFD) based discrete particle model and a finite element method and k-ε turbulence model to simulate and analyse the internal wind flow field and the trajectory of the droplet particles in the dust hood. The nozzle was then selected and a dust control and reduction system and treatment solution with a new pneumatic spiral spray technology at the core suitable for coal transfer points was investigated by optimising the atomisation performance of the nozzle. The field application shows that the developed dust cover can effectively prevent coal dust from spreading and improve the efficiency of suppressing coal dust pollution, which greatly improves the working environment.

2 Mathematical model

COMSOL Multiphysics is a multi-field coupled calculation software based on finite element theory. The basic module is quite complete in theory and can be supplemented with specialised solution modules for the joint solution of multiple physical fields. In this study, the k-ε turbulence model is firstly used to establish a three-dimensional computational mathematical model of the characteristic distribution of the wind flow field at the reproduction point. Secondly, the DEM method is used to assume the particles as discrete masses, and the fluid flow particle tracking module is used to track the released particles and obtain the results of the spatial and temporal distribution of the various characteristics of the particles at each spatial location. Finally, the directional switching of the inlet and outlet of the wind flow is used to control the relative direction of the wind flow and the coal transfer (Deji Jing et al., 2021[12]; Zhang Tian et al., 2020) [20].

CFD is used to calculate flow field data for the continuous phase of the fluid, assuming that the fluid conforms to the equations for conservation of momentum, mass and energy.

The conservation of momentum equation, from Newton’s second law, gives
$\begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial (ρ u_{x})}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (ρ u_{x} \vec{u}) = - \frac{\partial p}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial τ_{x x}}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial τ_{y x}}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial τ_{z x}}{\partial z} + ρ f_{x} \\ \frac{\partial ρ (ρ u_{y})}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (ρ u_{y} \vec{u}) = - \frac{\partial p}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial τ_{x y}}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial τ_{y y}}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial y}{\partial z} + ρ f_{y} \\ \frac{\partial (ρ u_{z})}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot (ρ u_{z} \vec{u}) = - \frac{\partial p}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial τ_{x z}}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial τ_{y z}}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial τ_{z z}}{\partial z} + ρ f_{z} \end{array}$
(1)
where u_x, u_y, u_z velocity components, m/s; ρ: fluid density, kg/m³; τ_xx, τ_xy, τ_xz viscous stress, N; f_x, f_y, f_z: force per unit mass, m/s².
Conservation of mass equation
$\frac{\partial ρ}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial ρ (u_{x})}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial ρ (u_{y})}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial ρ (u_{z})}{\partial z} = 0$
(2)
where u_x, u_y, u_zvelocity components, m/s; ρ: fluid density, kg/m³.
The energy equation, from the first law of thermodynamics, gives:
$\frac{\partial (ρ E)}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot [\vec{u} (ρ E + p)] = \nabla \cdot [k_{e f f} \nabla T - \sum_{j} h_{j} J_{j} + (τ_{e f f \cdot u})] + S_{h}$
(3)
where E: total energy of the sum of internal, kinetic and potential energy, J/kg; E = h-p/ρ+u²; h: enthalpy, J/kg; h_j is the enthalpy of component j, J/kg; k_eff is the effective heat transfer coefficient, W/(m∙k); k_eff= k+k_j, k: turbulent heat transfer coefficient; J_j: diffusive flux of component j; S_h: volumetric heat source term.

It is assumed that the dust particles are mainly subject to gravity, buoyancy, traction and lift forces. The equations of motion for dust particle dynamics:

$m_{p} = \frac{d u_{p}}{d t} = F_{g} + F_{f} + F_{d} + F_{x}$

(4)

Where: m_p is the mass of the solid particle, mg; u_p is the speed of movement of the solid particle, m/s; F_d is the resistance to the particle, N; F_g is the particle’s own gravity, N; F_f the buoyancy of the airflow to which the particle is subjected, N; F_x is the other forces acting on the particle, including: gravity, buoyancy, stoke traction, lift, N.

The turbulence model is assumed to fit the turbulent kinetic energy equation (k equation):

$\frac{\partial (ρ k)}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial (ρ k u_{i})}{\partial x_{i}} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{i}} [(μ + \frac{μ_{i}}{σ_{k}}) \frac{\partial (k)}{\partial x_{j}}] + G_{k} - ρ ε$

(5)

Turbulent energy dissipation rate equation (ε):

$\frac{\partial (ρ ε)}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial (ρ ε u_{i})}{\partial x_{i}} = \frac{\partial}{\partial x_{i}} [(μ + \frac{μ_{i}}{σ_{ε}}) \frac{\partial (ε)}{\partial x_{j}}] + ρ C_{1} E ε - ρ C_{2} \frac{ε^{2}}{k + \sqrt{v ε}}$

(6)

Where: C₁ = max[0.43,η/(η+5)], η = E_k/ε;C₂ is a constant; $E = \sqrt{2 E_{i j} + E_{i j}}$ ; G_k turbulent kinetic energy generation, G_k = μ_iE², μ_t is the viscosity coefficient; σ_k, σ_ε respectively k equation and ε equation of turbulent flow in the flow field Prandtl coefficient, the calculation to take the empirical value C₂ is 1.9, σ_k = 1.0, σ_ε = 1.2.

3 Construction of numerical modeling physical model and meshing

In the process of meshing, it should not be too thin or too rough to mesh according to the actual situation, otherwise it will affect the calculation accuracy and calculation time of the computer. Therefore, before numerical solution, the physical model should be meshed according to the actual situation and the model.

3.1 The physical model

In order to verify the relative wind flow transfer simulation, the coal material is transferred from the downstream channel of the 00 working face to the east belt roadway through two transfer points, and transported from the east belt to the underground coal bunker. The dust pollution in the west roadway section below the east belt transfer point is very serious (Fig 1).

Open in a separate window

Fig 1

Physical model of the transfer point.

3.2 The mesh subdivision

The spatial distribution of each major structure in this transfer point geometric model, and the geometric model established within COMSOL software according to the production system diagram, with simple geometry instead of belt conveyor turbine, control box, etc. Ignoring the pressure air pipeline, cable space volume and roadway wall roughness, assuming the same height of coal material transported on the tape surface and the traction effect on the wind flow with generalised roughness, baffle The transfer side of the tape is different from the incoming side of the tape in terms of the degree of accumulation, and the incoming side of the coal is regarded as a zero accumulation structure mainly including the upper belt conveyor, the lower belt conveyor, and the falling coal baffle. The lower belt conveyor is arranged in the east rubber transport lane, the height difference with the upper belt conveyor is 1.5 m, the lane width is 4 m and the height is 3.5 m. The angle between the two lanes on the horizontal plane is 39 (Fig 2).

Open in a separate window

Fig 2

Reprint point model grid diagram.

The mesh is free-filled with a tetrahedral mesh hydrodynamic finer, with a total cell count of 6559134 and an average cell mass of 0.6752. The transfer point lane mesh size is set to 0.8, and the upper belt conveyor, lower belt conveyor and coal drop baffle are set to 0.4, with the minimum size being the default value, in order to obtain an unstructured mesh for the geometric model and make the results of the numerical simulation more accurate.

Boundary conditions are set based on experimental tests, wind speed at the lower belt conveyor transport lane is 0.2 m/s, wind speed at the upper belt conveyor contact lane is 0.15 m/s, the downhole air is relatively thin, the density is set to 1.25 kg/m³, the outlet is set to free outlet, the reference pressure is 1 atm, the running speed of the belt conveyor is taken as the maximum value 4 m/s. Belt conveyor boundary settings Generalised rough wall, set at 0.8 cm according to actual coal build-up height, roughness factor 0.26. Reference temperature 293.15 K.

3.3 Physical modeling and meshing of the device

Through the study of vortex formation at the transfer point and the ability of the spiral spray to capture and suppress the coal dust driven by the vortex, the treatment measure of setting up a spiral spray dust cover is proposed to further enclose the dust and prevent dust diffusion.

3.3.1 Physical model of device

As shown in Fig 3, Pneumatic spiral nozzle design based on gas-solid two-phase flow theory, confined space and free space hydrodynamic theory, aerodynamic theory. Based on the pneumatic spiral spray tank to develop a model, set the model consists of two models of the spiral nozzle and the outer field, the spiral nozzle initial setting conditions for the outer nozzle cylindrical radius of 30 mm, 50 mm high, the internal dome radius of 15 mm, the angle of 73.3° outside the field model set for the cylinder, the radius of 500 mm, the height of 1000 mm. The actual actual size of the device and the model ratio is 4:1, the spiral spray device is set at the center of the circle at the top of the dust cover, and according to the particle trajectory distribution of coal dust and wind flow distribution rules, two groups of spray devices are arranged in the direction of the diffusion of fine particle size dust, and the fine particles are trapped by water mist dust suppression, and the atomising nozzle is a gas-liquid two-phase pneumatic atomising nozzle, which can effectively control the disturbing wind flow at the reloading point, and The pneumatic atomising nozzle can effectively control the disturbing wind flow at the transfer point, and the micron-level droplets are well combined with dust below 20 μm, resulting in high dust reduction efficiency. The pneumatic circuit air pressure is proposed 0.4MPa, water flow rate 4 L/min. The bottom of the unit is provided with an opening (Fig 3).

Open in a separate window

Fig 3

Installation of pneumatic screw spray and dust removal device.

3.3.2 Device grid division

The geometric model was meshed through the grid, and the overall quality of the grid was improved by modifying the size, shape and density of the low-quality grid. The accuracy of the numerical simulation results is closely related to the quality of the grid. Refinement is used at the transition of the section and is also used at the change in height difference angle to establish a total of 511325 grids with an average grid mass of 0.22. A dust control technology device grid is established, and the overall grid division is conducted to obtain a total of 387249 grid cells, of which the minimum cell mass is 0.005124. The boundary conditions were set based on experimental tests and simulated according to the model parameters (Fig 4). The values of the parameters set for the boundary conditions in the simulation are shown in Table 1.

Open in a separate window

Fig 4

Model drawing of spiral nozzle.

Table 1

Boundary conditions and parameter values.

Project	Name	Parameter setting
Boundary condition	Lower lane inlet air velocity (m/s)	0.2
	Upper lane inlet air velocity (m/s)	0.15
	Outlet pressure (pa)	0
	Air density(kg/m³)	1.25
Dust source parameters	Continuous-phase dynamic viscosity (Pa·s)	1.8×10–5
	Molecular diffusion coefficient of gas (m2/s-1)	2×10–5
	Density of particles themselves (g/cm³)	1.33
	Number of entry particles	1000
	Max particle size of dust (m)	3.16e-6
	Min particle size of dust (m)	1.43e-5
Droplet source parameters	Nozzle flow rate (L/min)	11.5
	Initial velocity (m/s)	8
	Half angle of atomization (°)	40

Open in a separate window

3.4 Reliability verification and analysis

The droplet size is measured by a spray laser particle size meter, which is designed using the Fronhofer diffraction principle and a typical parallel optical path. In combination with a high performance high power laser source, the droplet testing is carried out. As shown in the histogram in Fig 5, it can be seen in the histogram that the particle size of 8μm to 15μm accounts for the largest amount when the air pressure reaches 7Mpa, and by the line graph it can be seen that the overall particle size is below 20μm when the optical coverage has reached 80%, thus proving that the pneumatic spiral spray nozzle can achieve the required effect of dust reduction at the loading point.in the histogram can be reflected in the air pressure up to 7Mpa particle size in 8μm ~ 15μm accounted for a larger amount, the line graph shows that the particle size overall in the 20μm below the optical coverage has reached 80%, can effectively capture the transfer point diffusion of small particle size coal dust, proving that the pneumatic spiral nozzle to meet the coal transfer loading point dust reduction requirements (Fig 5).

Open in a separate window

Fig 5

Structure diagram of pneumatic spiral nozzle.

The experimental platform was built with the following experimental apparatus: water tank, gas storage tank, pneumatic spiral nozzle, etc. This experiment takes the method of data comparison, prepare two groups of the same quality type of coal dust taken back from the site, the first group of experiments through the homemade dust collector will be sprayed into the open transparent dust box, by the coal dust collector for data collection, after one minute coal dust is still in suspension; the second group of experiments in the coal dust spray while turning on the pneumatic spiral nozzle, by the coal dust collector for data collection. The final comparison yielded a dust reduction efficiency of 93% for the spiral spray dust hood. It can be seen that the spiral airflow drives the spray to form a spiral mist curtain in a spiral shape, when the coal dust impacts the spiral mist curtain, the coal dust can be isolated and controlled in the spiral mist curtain, effectively preventing the spread of coal dust, which also coincides with the spiral advance of the spray particles in the numerical simulation, verifying the accuracy of the numerical simulation (Fig 6).

Open in a separate window

Fig 6

Experimental results of spray dustfall.

4 Numerical simulation analysis

4.1 Velocity analysis of airflow field at transfer point

The average wind speed of the whole tunnel is 0.353 m/s and the wind speed of the belt surface is 2.1 m/s. The wind speed in the lower tunnel is higher than the wind speed in the upper tunnel due to the influence of the support bar below the belt, as can be seen from the overall distribution, the wind flow velocity shows a belt distribution in both horizontal and vertical directions, longitudinally from the top plate downwards: acceleration belt along the top plate, central buffer belt, belt surface traction acceleration belt and bottom plate deceleration belt. The horizontal direction can be divided into a near-wall acceleration belt, a mid-side deceleration mixed belt and a central belt traction reverse acceleration belt. At the front end of the transfer point where the wind converges, the wind velocity rises significantly and is influenced by the upper belt and the wind flow, the speed of the tunnel wall at the lower belt crossing reaches 0.8m/s~1.6m/s and is influenced by the baffle, the wind flow and the belt transport speed to form a vortex (Fig 7).

Open in a separate window

Fig 7

Lower lane upwind coal transfer velocity distribution diagram.

The four pictures (a), (b), (c) and (d) in Fig 8 are the airflow distribution of the lower roadway at different heights. Z = 1.5, Z = 2, Z = 2.5, Z = 3, respectively. The wind velocity values in the xy plane on the line corresponding to different x-coordinate values, x = 0.5, x = 1, x = 1.5, x = 2, x = 2.5, are used to analyse the wind flow distribution pattern in the cross lane. At Z = 1.5 m, which is exactly where the baffle and associated structures are located, the resistance caused by them causes a large change in wind flow at Y = 6 m and mainly occurs near the belt face. The increase in velocity is evident after the wind flow crosses the baffle, which is due to the effect of the converging wind. As the simulation assumes that the air in the underground tunnel is an incompressible gas, the converging air flow from the upper tunnel increases the flow on the downwind side of the lower tunnel at a constant tunnel section, resulting in a significant increase in wind speed at a constant section. The maximum wind speed is up to 1.7 m/s and occurs at x = 0.5 m and x = 1 m. This is near the belt side of the lower tunnel, mainly due to the low resistance in this area and the inertial force of the wind flow, which is squeezed by the incoming fresh air when it hits the wall and forms an acceleration area along the wall. As shown in Fig 6, in the centre of the tunnel, as the height increases and the closer to the top of the tunnel, the horizontal wind flow velocity gradually decreases and the difference between the velocity on the downwind side and that on the incoming wind side gradually increases, this is because there are fewer structures near the top and the wind flow resistance becomes smaller. The frequency of the oscillation of the curve decreases and the amplitude decreases the closer the spatial section intercepted with the data is to the top plate at the height z = 1.5, indicating that the turbulence of the wind flow is greater below z = 2 m. Therefore, the wind flow velocity at the transfer point in three-dimensional space is obtained: the wind flow in the different zones is characterised by a greater wind speed above than below and a greater wind speed in the outlet direction than in the inlet direction. The wind flow is pulled by the roughness of the belt surface, accelerates along the belt running direction, and moves in the direction of the tunnel wall, and gradually decays along the near-wall side of the belt in the direction of the pavement. The speed of traction wind flow on the belt surface is around 1m/s, the wind flow traction speed is affected by the baffle, the wind flow around the baffle and the belt surface traction wind flow to form a spiral vortex, near the baffle and near the wall speed in the unified range: 0.4m/s ~ 0.6 m/s. Other locations in the tunnel wind speed increases from the top plate downward, from the belt downward decay, the speed size in 0.2 m/s or less (Fig 8).

Open in a separate window

Fig 8

Wind flow distribution curve in the centre of the lower lane.

This is because the upper belt is influenced by the wind flow at the transfer point during the coal transportation process, forming a traction acceleration trend at the end, while the lower belt shows an overall deceleration trend due to the influence of the wind flow from the upper belt and the role of the baffle, and the wind flow in the tunnel is stratified, with large changes in direction and more vortices. The wind velocity in the lane is stratified, with large changes in direction and more vortices. From the above analysis, we can basically obtain the stratified distribution of wind speed, which is mainly influenced by the position of the baffle, the angle of the lane and the distance between the tape faces. Therefore, three disturbance areas are obtained, which are located at the rendezvous point, at the baffle obstruction and at the new air inlet, where the lower belt pulls the wind flow to the new air inlet during the coal transport process and forms a disturbance with the new air flow in the lane. The vector cone density is highest and the flow turbulence is strongest within about 3 m of the transfer point. The vortex formation rule can be derived from a and b: the wind flow moves through the upper and lower lane with a height difference of 1.5m and an angle of 39°, the upper lane accelerates at the transfer point due to the traction of the upper belt surface and the wind flow velocity, the lower lane interferes with the wind flow at the head due to the traction of the lower belt floor and the velocity at the transfer point decreases. Under the influence of the angle of the lane and the height difference of the belt, the lower lane wind flow bypasses the baffle and crosses the upper lane wind flow at the front end of the transfer point at 3m, forming a vortex with an average speed of 0.45m/s (Fig 9).

Open in a separate window

Fig 9

Wind flow distribution characteristics and wind flow line trajectory.

4.2 Dust particle trajectory analysis

When the dust comes out of the transfer point for 5s, the coal dust particles transported by the upper belt fall to the lower belt through the wind baffle, during the falling process the coal dust particles are disturbed by the vortex to form a diffusion trend, part of the large diameter coal dust falls to the lower belt, the remaining small diameter coal dust is dispersed with the wind flow movement, from the three views shown in Fig 10, the coal dust mainly diffuses to the downwind side, and a small part diffuses to the incoming wind side. The coal dust is mainly dispersed to the downwind side, with a small amount spreading to the incoming wind side and a portion spreading to the bottom of the belt to form a pile. At 15s after the dust has fallen, the dust is completely dispersed and spreads in a scattered state in the direction of the coal transport, and the dust with a particle size of less than 20 μm spreads over a distance of 10 m. The degree of dispersal is greatly increased, mainly due to the high induced wind speed of the dust stripped from the coal stream. The coal dust movement law can be obtained: the coal conveying direction is consistent with the wind flow direction, which leads to the coal dust spreading farther, and the smaller the coal dust particle size is, the easier it is to be pulled by the wind flow, the coal dust spreading distance is mainly affected by the belt running direction and the angle of the roadway, and the coal dust is easily spread to the downwind side by the vortex, and the coal dust concentration is large on the downwind side and small on the upwind side of the reloading point (Fig 10).

Open in a separate window

Fig 10

Diffusion pollution range of coal dust with different particle sizes.

4.3 Analysis of wind flow field and droplet trajectory of the device

Based on the results of the wind flow distribution and particle trajectories from the tunnel simulation, a dust cover device is proposed for full vortex coverage. The nozzle internal air holes are arranged in a uniformly distributed eight-hole structure, the air holes are sprayed at the same angle, as shown in Fig 11, the airflow through the angle of the air holes and the impact of the inner wall of the nozzle to form a spiral spray, the airflow velocity at the air holes can reach 28m / s, the average airflow velocity in the dust cover can reach 2.76m / s, so through the flow line can be observed when the nozzle work to form a rotating cyclone around the cutting arm, as shown in Fig 11. The cyclone covers the entire transfer point of the dust pollution serious vortex area, and the direction of the wind flow can be observed through the direction of its rotation on the axis of the cut-off arm. The droplet particle trajectory is influenced by the airflow field to form a spiral state, the number of droplet particle size from the inside to the outside to form a decreasing trend and discrete state, the smallest particle size can reach 20μm or less, it can be seen that the droplet particles cover a wide area, and the vortex area coal dust to form a counterpart, can effectively capture the dust diffusion inside the dust cover. The droplet particles produced by the spiral pneumatic spraying device are broken instantly after spraying and then impacted by the spiral high-pressure gas all around, and the particle size is less than 20μm after secondary breaking, and the droplet particles are dispersed inside the device to capture the dust with lower particle size (Figs (Figs1111 and and1212).

Open in a separate window

Fig 11

Simulation of velocity field of spiral spray.

Open in a separate window

Fig 12

Spiral pneumatic spray fog drip particle trajectory.

5 Applications in the field

Before the application of the spiral spray dust hood to control dust, the No. 2 transfer point in the coal dust concentration, visibility is low, the amount of dust accumulation, and due to the influence of interference wind flow, so that the transfer point in the respiratory dust is difficult to settle, always in suspension free state, thus greatly increasing the chances of respiratory dust into the human body, causing human hazards. After the implementation of the treatment measures programme, the front-end 2 pneumatic atomising nozzles supplemented by the middle spiral spray dust cover when opened simultaneously, under the influence of the disturbing wind flow and vortex flow at the transfer point, can still efficiently remove and inhibit dust pollution at the transfer point, prompting a rapid decline in coal dust concentration.

The numerical simulation of the transfer point is combined with the measurement of actual data in the field. On the one hand, the accuracy of the simulation results was verified through actual measurements on site. On the other hand, the numerical simulation of the pneumatic spiral nozzle effectively guided the installation location of the spray dust reduction, resulting in respirable dust and total dust control efficiencies of 91.15% and 93.31% respectively. The experimental verification of the simulation and then the proposed on-site treatment measures device and installation method effectively reduced the dust concentration at the No. 2 transfer point, as shown in Table 2, the respirable coal dust pollution concentration at each measurement point of the pneumatic spiral spray dust hood at the No. 23 transfer point was between 2.04 and 53.57 mg/m3, and the respirable coal dust pollution concentration after the section was between 0.62 and 12.87 mg/m3, and the dust removal efficiency The dust removal efficiency reached 91.15%~93.31%, which greatly improved the working environment.

Table 2

Contrast of respiratory coal dust concentration before and after comprehensively controlling.

serial number	Measurement point name	Treatment, frontal coal dust concentration/(mg/m³)	Governing coal dust concentration/(mg/m³)	Dust reduction efficiency/%	Respiratory dust concentration before governance/(mg/m³)	Respiratory dust concentration after treatment/(mg/m³)	Dust reduction efficiency/%
1	Transfer point upper roadway upper wind side 3m	6.84	4.13	39.62	2.21	1.98	10.41
2	Dressing point lower roadway upper wind side 5m	2.04	1.52	25.51	0.62	0.53	14.52
3	Reploquette lower wind side 2M	53.57	3.58	93.31	12.87	1.14	91.15

Open in a separate window

6 Conclusion

The tunnel wind flow is accelerated by the belt traction and surface friction in the direction of the belt running and deflected towards the tunnel wall. The wind flow from above the belt moves around the baffle under the influence of inertia and baffle resistance through the belt traction action,with a speed between 0.4 m/s and 0.6 m/s. The wind velocity increases from the top plate downwards at other locations in the tunnel and decays from the belt downwards with velocities of 0.2 m/s or less.
The wind flow in the upper lane, under the influence of the upper belt surface traction and wind flow speed, reaches the reloading point for accelerated movement, the wind flow in the lower lane, under the action of the lower belt bottom plate traction wind flow, reaches the reloading point with reduced speed, and is affected by the lane angle and belt height difference, the lower lane wind flow around the baffle plate and the upper lane wind flow at the front end of the reloading point at 3m will form cross interference, resulting in The average velocity is 0.45m/s.
The droplet particle trajectory is influenced by the airflow field to form a spiral state, the number of droplet particle size from the inside to the outside to form a decreasing trend and discrete state, the smallest particle size can reach 20μm or less, it can be seen that the droplet particles cover a wide area, and the vortex area coal dust to form a counterpart, can effectively capture the dust diffusion inside the dust cover.
The method of experimentally verifying the simulation and then proposing on-site treatment measures devices and installing them effectively reduced the dust concentration at the No. 2 transfer point, the total dust mass concentration at 2m downwind of the No. 2 transfer point before treatment was 53.57 mg/m³ and the respiratory dust concentration was 12.87 mg-m-3, the total dust mass concentration was 3.58 mg/m³ after treatment with dust hoods, and the measured respiratory dust concentration The dust removal efficiency reached 91.15%~93.31%, which greatly improved the working environment.

Funding Statement

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (51704146) JDJ Natural science fund project in Liaoning Province (2020-MS-304) JDJ Liaoning provincial funding for scientific research projects (LJK0323) JDJ Funders play a supporting role in research design, data collection and analysis, publication decisions or manuscript preparation.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.

References

1. Hqw A, Jljb C, Zhao Q, et al. Analysis of Health Service Utilization and its Influencing Factors among Patients with Pneumoconiosis in China [J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2021, 34 (1):83–88. doi: 10.3967/bes2021.011 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

2. Zhao P, Schmidt M, Krause U, et al. Experimental study on the minimum explosion concentration of anthracite dust: The roles of O2 mole fraction, inert gas and CH4 addition [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2021, 72. [Google Scholar]

3. Wya B, Gang Z, Dga B. Simulation analysis and engineering application of distribution characteristics about multi-stage atomization field for cutting dust in fully mechanized mining face [J]. Advanced Powder Technology, 2019, 30 (11):2600–2615. [Google Scholar]

4. Zhang G, Sun B, Song S, et al. CFD comparative analysis on the pollution characteristics of coal dust under turbulent airflow from coal cutting in the fully mechanized mining face [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 146(1):515–530. [Google Scholar]

5. Faeth G M, Hsiang L P, Wu P K. Structure and breakup properties of sprays [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1995, 21(supp-S):99–127. [Google Scholar]

6. Zhou G, Zhang Q, Bai R, et al. The diffusion behavior law of respirable dust at fully mechanized caving face in coal mine: CFD numerical simulation and engineering application [J]. Process Safety & Environmental Protection, 2017, 106:117–128. [Google Scholar]

7. Zhang P, Mu Y, Shi Z, et al. Computational fluid dynamic analysis of airflow in belt dryer: effects of conveyor position on airflow distribution [J]. Energy Procedia, 2017, 142:1367–1374. [Google Scholar]

8. Zhang G, Sun B, Song S, et al. CFD comparative analysis on the pollution characteristics of coal dust under turbulent airflow from coal cutting in the fully mechanized mining face [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 146(1):515–530. [Google Scholar]

9. Hpa B, Wen N, Zla B, et al. Optimization of external spray negative-pressure mist-curtain dust suppression devices for road headers based on a multi-factor orthogonal experiment [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 275. [Google Scholar]

10. Zhang Q, Zhou G, Qian X, et al. Diffuse pollution characteristics of respirable dust in fully-mechanized mining face under various velocities based on CFD investigation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 184(MAY 20):239–250. [Google Scholar]

11. Wang P, Li Y, Liu R, et al. Effects of forced-to-exhaust ratio of air volume on dust control of wall-attached swirling ventilation for mechanized excavation face [J]. Tunnelling and underground space technology, 2019, 90(AUG.):194–207. [Google Scholar]

12. Jing Deji, Jia Xin, Ge Shaocheng, Zhang Tian, Ma Mingxing. Numerical simulation and experimental study of vortex blowing suction dust control in a coal yard with multiple dust production points [J]. Powder Technology,2021,388:554–565. [Google Scholar]

13. Xu C, Nie W, Yang S, et al. Numerical simulation of the multi-index orthogonal experiments on the spray dust-settling devices [J]. Powder Technology, 2020, 371. [Google Scholar]

14. Zhong’an Jiang, Jiang Lan, Chen Jushi, 2013. Numerical simulation of dust con-centration distribution regularities of down-the-hole drilling in open-pit mine.J. Shenzhen Univ. Sci. Eng. 30(3),313–318. [Google Scholar]

15. Ronghua Liu, Wang Haiqiao, Shi Shiliang, Liu Heqing, 2000.The simulating test study on using air curtain to frevent excavating driver’s area from dust. J.Hunan Univ.Sci.Technol.15(3),17–21. [Google Scholar]

16. Cheng G, Wen N, Cxa B, et al. A study of the spray atomization and suppression of tunnel dust pollution based on a CFD-based simulation [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276. [Google Scholar]

17. Zhang Tian, Jing Deji, Ge Shaocheng, Wang Jiren, Chen Xi. Supersonic antigravity aerodynamic atomization dusting nozzle based on the Laval nozzle and probe jet [J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering,2020,42(2015) (SCI). [Google Scholar]

18. ToranO J, Torno S, Menéndez M, et al. Auxiliary ventilation in mining roadways driven with road headers: Validated CFD modelling of dust behaviour [J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2011, 26(1):201–210. [Google Scholar]

19. Du T,Nie W, Chen D, et al. CFD Modeling of Coal Dust Migration in an 8.8-Meter-High Fully Mechanized Mining Face[J]. Energy, 2020, 212:118616. [Google Scholar]

20. Tian Zhang, Deji Jing, Shaocheng Ge, Jiren Wang, Xi Chen, Shuai Shuai Ren. Dust removal characteristics of a supersonic antigravity siphon atomization nozzle [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering,2020,12(12).1687814020977689. [Google Scholar]

21. Wang P, Li Y, Liu R, et al. Effects of forced-to-exhaust ratio of air volume on dust control of wall-attached swirling ventilation for mechanized excavation face [J]. Tunnelling and underground space technology, 2019, 90(AUG.):194–207. [Google Scholar]

22. Qin Y, Jiang Z, Zhang M, et al. Comparison of simulation on dust migration regularity in fully mechanized workface [J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University(Natural Science), 2014. [Google Scholar]

23. Gang Z, Bo F, Yin W, et al. Numerical simulations on airflow-dust diffusion rules with the use of coal cutter dust removal fans and related engineering applications in a fully-mechanized coal mining face [J]. Powder Technology, 2018, 339:354–367. [Google Scholar]

24. Zhang Tian, Jing Deji, Ge Shaocheng, Wang Jiren, Meng Xiangxi, Ren Shuai Shuai. Numerical simulation of the dimensional transformation of atomization in a supersonic aerodynamic atomization dust-removing nozzle based on transonic speed compressible flow [J]. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology,2020,7(3):597–610. [Google Scholar]

PLoS One. 2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Decision Letter 0

2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Published online 2022 Aug 22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272304.r001

Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi, Academic Editor

27 Apr 2022

PONE-D-22-08269Study on Coal Dust Diffusion Law and New Pneumatic Spiral Spray Dedusting Technology at Transfer Point of Mine Cross RoadwayPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. zhang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 11 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office atgro.solp@enosolp. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1:Yes

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1:Yes

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1:Yes

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1:Yes

Reviewer #2:Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1:The subject of the research is the study of dust control device equipment proposed for the problem of dust pollution at the transfer point, which is based on the theory of a spiral spray device and is investigated using a finite element - dynamic mesh modelling method. The reliability of the simulation is adequately given in terms of the airflow flow and dust dispersion at the transfer point site. The solution of treating the transfer point with a dust cover is proposed, the wind flow field and particle trajectory at the simulated transfer point are studied to obtain the vortex distribution law, the dust cover is installed for the vortex location, and the internal wind flow and droplet distribution are simulated. The idea is relatively new, well argued and the data is reliable. I believe that the results of the study can provide an important reference for research on dust management at mine transfer points. However, the quality of the writing of the paper still needs to be improved, and I support the publication of this paper if these following issues are addressed (with minor modifications).

1. The inconsistency of proper names in Figure 1 suggests a correction.

2. Some references are not cited in the article and need to be added.

3. Some of the images have blurred text resulting in the information in the images not being read by the reader and affecting the overall nature of the article. For example, Figure 8, Figure 10.

4. The text has a large number of images applied to the wind flow field at the point of reproduction, it is recommended that the images be combined or selectively deleted.

5. Boundary conditions are very important for numerical simulations and different boundary conditions can affect the final results of the simulation, therefore boundary conditions should be specified. It is recommended to add dust source conditions and droplet atomisation conditions.

6. The authors' figure 12 reflects the spiral spray velocity field wind flow curve and is missing units. The dust hood is also a closed device and when spraying for a longer period of time there should be a build-up of droplets and wind flow at the bottom, whether the author's device has an opening should be clarified.

7. In the design of the treatment solution in paper 4.1, the authors demonstrate that the spray device is effective in capturing small particle size coal dust by measuring the droplet size with a spray laser particle size meter, the basis of which needs to be detailed.

8. Authors should use superscripts for numbers in m³ in their conclusions.

9. The description of the experimental section is too brief and does not indicate a clear method of experimentation.

Reviewer #2:In order to solve the problem of coal dust pollution at the conveying point, the manuscript adopts computational fluid dynamics (CFD) discrete particle model, finite element method and K- ε Based on the turbulence model, the three-dimensional air flow coal dust numerical model of the loading point of the underground rubber runway is established, and the coal dust diffusion pollution caused by the coal flow movement at the air flow intersection in the cross tunnel is studied. The influence mechanism of airflow and coal dust, the distribution of airflow and the characteristics of coal dust diffusion in the roadway are analyzed. A dust control and reduction system and a treatment scheme are put forward, which are based on the new pneumatic screw spray technology, so as to suppress the coal dust pollution at the refueling point. The field application shows that the developed dust cover can effectively prevent the diffusion of coal dust and improve the efficiency of coal dust pollution control, and has a good application prospect. The manuscript is rich in content and is worth revising and publishing. However, the manuscript still has the following problems.

1. Please compare the two groups of experiments in section 3.3.4 with charts.

2. Why is the wind speed at the lower part of the tunnel greater than that at the upper part?

3. What are the characteristics of wind speed distribution in different zonal areas in horizontal and vertical directions?

4. Put forward reasonable suggestions according to the numerical simulation results.

5. It is suggested that the findings of this study be discussed more in the summary.

6. There are insufficient references, so more references need to be supplemented. The background and mechanism of seepage are not introduced clearly. In particular, The failure and damage characteristics of rock should be further described. The author should introduce this mechanism.

Ecological risk assessment of soil and water loss by thermal enhanced methane recovery: Numerical study using two-phase flow simulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 334, 130183.

Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical modelling for geothermal doublet system with 3D fractal fracture. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 200, 117716.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1:Yes:Jianwei Cheng

Reviewer #2:No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool,https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS atgro.solp@serugif. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Author response to Decision Letter 0

2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Published online 2022 Aug 22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272304.r002

30 Apr 2022

I've put all the replies you requested into the file and submitted it. If it's not done correctly, please let me know by the editor and I'll change it again, thank you.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responese to reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.^{(14K, docx)}

PLoS One. 2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Decision Letter 1

2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Published online 2022 Aug 22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272304.r003

Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi, Academic Editor

30 May 2022

PONE-D-22-08269R1Study on Coal Dust Diffusion Law and New Pneumatic Spiral Spray Dedusting Technology at Transfer Point of Mine Cross RoadwayPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. zhang,

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 14 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office atgro.solp@enosolp. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.
A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.
An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3:All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #4:All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #3:Yes

Reviewer #4:Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3:Yes

Reviewer #4:Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

Reviewer #3:Yes

Reviewer #4:Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

Reviewer #3:Yes

Reviewer #4:Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #3:The paper has been well revised and has high guiding value for the site. It is recommended to accept the paper.

Reviewer #4:The subject of this paper is about the control of dust pollution at the coal transfer point of the mine, which is studied by the finite element-dynamic mesh modeling method, and the wind flow field and dust particle trajectory at the transfer point site are simulated by the simulation COMSOL software, and the reliability of the simulation is verified through experiments and other perspectives. The wind flow field and particle trajectory of the simulated coal transfer site are studied to obtain the vortex distribution law, and the dust cover device is proposed to control the law. The idea is very novel, the arguments are more solid and the data are reliable. I think the research results can provide valuable reference for the research of dust pollution control at the coal transfer point of mine. There is no problem with the macroscopic nature of the overall article, there are some problems that need to be revised, and I recommend publishing this article if the following problems are solved.

1. The specific location of the coal transfer point should be shown in the roadway distribution system map of picture 1.

2. 3.3.1 The experimental part of the device is recommended to be put to the later reliability verification.

3. 3.3.2 The content lacks the specific description of the device dimensions.

4. The content of 3.3.3 does not match with the described picture and needs to be revised.

5. The font in Figure 11 is different from the font of other pictures, and it is suggested to be modified.

6. 4.3 The content analysis is less, and it is suggested to add specificity.

7. Conclusion 1 suggests specific description. And there is no serial number.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3:No

Reviewer #4:No

PLoS One. 2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Author response to Decision Letter 1

2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Published online 2022 Aug 22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272304.r004

10 Jun 2022

Dear Editor,

I thank the editor for allowing me to revise the article to make him better.

Yours sincerely,

Tianzhang

1. The specific location of the coal transfer point should be shown in the roadway distribution system map of picture 1.

Answer:Modification completed

2. 3.3.1 The experimental part of the device is recommended to be put to the later reliability verification.

Answer:Modified and added to the current paragraph 3.4, combined with the original 3.3.4 into one paragraph

3. 3.3.2 The content lacks the specific description of the device dimensions.

Answer:Modified, in what is now paragraph 3.3.1

4. The content of 3.3.3 does not match with the described picture and needs to be revised.

Answer:Modified, in what is now paragraph 3.3.2

5. The font in Figure 11 is different from the font of other pictures, and it is suggested to be modified.

Answer:Modification completed

6. 4.3 The content analysis is less, and it is suggested to add specificity.

Answer:Modification completed

7. Conclusion 1 suggests specific description. And there is no serial number.

Answer:Modification completed

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responese to reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.^{(12K, docx)}

PLoS One. 2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Decision Letter 2

2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Published online 2022 Aug 22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272304.r005

Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi, Academic Editor

18 Jul 2022

Study on Coal Dust Diffusion Law and New Pneumatic Spiral Spray Dedusting Technology at Transfer Point of Mine Cross Roadway

PONE-D-22-08269R2

Dear Dr. zhang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at gro.solp@gnillibrohtua.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact gro.solp@sserpeno.

Kind regards,

Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #3:All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #3:Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3:Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

Reviewer #3:Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

Reviewer #3:Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #3:The paper has been fully revised to meet the requirements of the journal and is recommended to be published.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3:No

**********

PLoS One. 2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Acceptance letter

2022; 17(8): e0272304.

Published online 2022 Aug 22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272304.r006

Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi, Academic Editor

28 Jul 2022

PONE-D-22-08269R2

Study on Coal Dust Diffusion Law and New Pneumatic Spiral Spray Dedusting Technology at Transfer Point of Mine Cross Roadway

Dear Dr. Zhang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact gro.solp@sserpeno.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at gro.solp@enosolp.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Mohammad Mehdi Rashidi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS